The 5 Biological Laws of Nature

1) Iron Rule of Cancer (DHS)

According to the theory, many conditions begin with a biological conflict — a dramatic, unexpected event (the Dirk Hamer Syndrome). This conflict is said to trigger a “special program” across brain–organ–psyche as an adaptive response.

Note: this conflict→disease causality is not supported by mainstream biomedical research.

2) The Two‑Phase Law

Every “special program” allegedly shows two phases if the conflict is resolved:

• Conflict‑active phase (sympathicotonia): stress, cold extremities, hyper‑focus on the conflict.
• Healing phase (vagotonia): fatigue, tissue repair, possible edema; sometimes a short “healing crisis” precedes resolution.

Note: the two‑phase model is a historical hypothesis, not a clinical protocol.

3) Ontogenetic System of Tumors and Equivalent Diseases

The framework links the embryonic origin of tissues (endoderm, mesoderm, ectoderm) with how they allegedly react during the two phases. Different tissues are said to show distinct patterns of growth or repair.

Note: this is a conceptual map, not a medically recognized classification.

4) Ontogenetic System of Microbes

Here, bacteria, fungi, and viruses are portrayed less as primary pathogens and more as agents participating in tissue repair, according to biological context.

Conventional medicine generally treats microbes as opportunistic or pathogenic; this alternative view is not validated by modern evidence.

5) The Quintessence

The “quintessence” proposes that every process bears a context‑dependent adaptive meaning. It is a philosophical–biological lens, not a therapeutic directive.

— Antonietta Laura Girardi